Climbing the Hierarchy of Masculinity: Asian American Men’s Cross-Racial Competition for Intimacy with White ladies

Studies of masculinity have actually centered on the inequalities among various sets of males, yet they’ve neglected to think about women’s roles in men’s engagement in a variety of roles within hegemonic masculinity. Making use of life-history interviews with five interracial partners consists of Asian US males and white ladies, also five people who either were or was in fact associated with an Asian US man/white woman interracial few, this short article examines the cross-racial competition by which Asian US men employ numerous methods to ascend the masculinity hierarchy by searching for white women’s validation of the manhood. Asian United states men’s competition that is cross-racial four distinct procedures: detesting white masculinities; approximating to white masculinities; eschewing white masculinities; and failing when you look at the make an effort to maneuver white masculinities. The author further addresses how the emerging Asian American masculinities that are constructed by Asian American men and white women in the context of intimate relationships challenge or reinforce the current orders of race, class, and gender by analyzing these four processes.

This might be a preview of membership content, log on to check always access.

Access choices

Purchase solitary article

Access immediately into the article PDF that is full.

Price includes VAT for Moldova

Donate to journal

Immediate on line access to any or all dilemmas from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.

This is basically the price that is net. Fees become calculated in checkout.

Demetriou writes that effeminate masculinity is subordinated to your hegemonic type of white masculinity that is heterosexual “while other people, such as for instance working course or black colored masculinities, are simply just ‘marginalized’” (2001:341–342). Regarding the huge huge difference between “subordinate” and “marginalized, ” Connell and Demetriou try not to discuss them as two rigidly split categories, which either include homosexual males or males of color. Relating to Demetriou, “… While subordination relates to relations interior to your sex purchase, the thought of marginalization defines the relationships between your masculinities in principal and subordinated classes or cultural teams, that is, the relations that derive from the interplay of sex along with other structures, such as for instance course and ethnicity” (2001:342).

Demetriou 16, p. 341 writes, “Hegemonic masculinity, understood as external hegemony, is linked to the institutionalization of men’s dominance over ladies…. Hegemonic masculinity creates not just external but additionally interior hegemony, that is, hegemony over other masculinities… ”

Among several, two studies are of specific note: one on class-based masculinities played away as males’s social energy over feamales in marital relationships 44, and another on homosexual fraternity people’ challenges to hegemonic masculinity and the reification of male dominance over women 55.

Connell 12 contends that the idea of hegemonic femininity is improper. Faculties of femininity are globally built in terms of the dominance of masculinities; hence, femininities signify the subordination of females to guys by which females’s domination of males seldom happens. Nevertheless, Pyke and Johnson 45 claim that the idea of hegemonic femininities critically addresses the hierarchy among ladies of various classes and events. They compose, “However, this offers just exactly just how other axes of domination, such as for example race, course, sexuality, and age, mildew a hegemonic femininity that is venerated and extolled within the principal tradition, and that emphasizes the superiority of some females over others, thus privileging white upper-class women” (35).

I interpreted his reference to “American” women instead of “white” women as his customary conflation common among a few Asian American ethnic groups as I discussed in the method section.


Benjamin, J. (1988). The bonds of love. Nyc, NY: Pantheon.

Bernard, J. (1972). The ongoing future of wedding. Ny, NY: World Pub.

Bird, S. (1996). Welcome to the men’s club: Homosociality additionally the upkeep of hegemonic masculinity. Gender & Community, 10(2), 120–132.

Bonilla-Silva, E. (2002). Many of us are People in america!: The Latin Americanization of Racial Stratification in america. Race& Community, 5, 3–16.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of the concept of training. London: Cambridge University Press.

Chancer, L. (1998). Reconcilable distinctions: Confronting beauty, pornography, as well as the future of feminism. Berkeley, CA: University of Ca Press.

Chen, A. (1999). Everyday lives during the center for the periphery, life at the periphery regarding the center: Chinese US masculinities and bargaining with hegemony. Gender & Community, 13(5), 584–607.

Chow, S. (2000). The value of battle into the sphere that is private Asian People in the us and spousal choices. Sociological Inquiry, 70(1), 1–29.

Collins, P. H. (2004). Ebony sexual politics: African Us citizens, sex, and also the racism that is new. Nyc, NY: Routledge.

Coltrane, S. (1994). Theorizing masculinities in modern science that is social. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds. ), Theorizing masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Connell, R. (1992). An extremely right gay: Masculinity, homosexual experience, therefore the characteristics of sex. United States Sociological Review, 57(6), 735–751.

Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Connell, R., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the idea. Gender & Community, 19(6), 829–859.

Constable, N. (2003). Romance for a international phase: Pen pals, digital ethnography, and “mail order” marriages. Berkeley, CA: University of Ca Press.

Davis, K. (1941). Intermarriage in caste communities. US Anthropologist, 43(3), 376–395.

Demetriou, D. (2001). Connell’s idea of hegemonic masculinity: a review. Theory and Society, 30(3), 337–361.

Espiritu, Y. (1992). Asian American Panethnicity: Bridging organizations and identities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

peruvian brides

Espiritu, Y. (1996). Asian US ladies and males: work, rules, and love. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Espiritu, Y. (2001). “We don’t rest around like white girls do”: Family, tradition, and sex in Filipina American life. Signs: Journal of females in Culture and community, 26(2), 415–440.

Gardiner, J. K. (2005). Guys, masculinities and feminist concept. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds. ), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.